yeah but then I have to do all sorts of "unit" testing, and "robust fault-tolerant code", who has the time? ;-)
Jason On Feb 5, 8:19 am, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]> wrote: > We accept patches, did you know ? ;-) > > -Markus > > 2009/2/5 jasonsirota <[email protected]>: > > > > > Yes, it worked thank you for all your help, I ended up creating my own > > static methods in inherited base classes so I can share the > > functionality throughout the project, perhaps this isn't any cleaner, > > but it makes me FEEL better :D > > > public static T[] FindAll(bool cacheable) > > { > > if (!cacheable) > > return FindAll(); > > else > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > .SetCacheable(cacheable)); > > } > > > public static T[] FindAll(Order order, bool cacheable) > > { > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > .SetCacheable(cacheable) > > .AddOrder(order)); > > } > > > public static T[] FindAll(Order[] orders, bool cacheable) > > { > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > .SetCacheable(cacheable),orders); > > } > > > On Feb 4, 8:20 pm, Daniel Pupek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You'll use the detached criterion a lot. Don't worry if the criterion > >> syntax > >> seems a bit odd. You'll pick it up fast. For SQL junkies HQL tends to go > >> down a bit easier...I hear that hql exhibits a little better performance > >> but > >> we haven't noticed a difference. > >> A couple notes though, you can't resuse a DetachedCriteria once it has been > >> passed to activerecord. You can call .Clone though to get a replica of it. > >> Don't try to over optimize things on your own by using the session or > >> static > >> properties. You just end up stepping on top of what Nhibernate is doing for > >> you. Nhibernate and active record have some interest ways to control the > >> caching...you just have to play with it a bit and in the long run you'll be > >> a lot happier. > > >> Don't worry about opening and closing sessions....ActiveRecord does a fair > >> bit of the session handling for you. You'll just end up creating a bunch of > >> Stack Overflows. If you have a non-trivial situation and believe you need > >> to > >> circumvent the automatic session scopes then place your code inside of a > >> using statement: > > >> using(new SessionScope()) > >> { > > >> Do some active record stuff here! > > >> } > > >> ActiveRecord will generally try to use the last sessionscope opened...the > >> using statement ensures it is disposed properly. > > >> Dan > > >> Checkout my blog @http://blog.agilejedi.com > >> Checkout my homepage @http://www.agilejedi.com > > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Interesting, that does seem easier. I thought there might be something > >> > with DC but I couldn't figure out how to create one. > > >> > The reason I'm pulling all and caching is every page has a > >> > "Categories" dropdown list that's needed before any dynamic items are > >> > pulled from the database. So I could just pull the Name/ID pairs for > >> > the dropdown list, populate it into a hash and cache it, but I know I > >> > will need the category objects anyway and the overhead of pre-caching > >> > the full list on application load is pretty low. > > >> > Jason > > >> > On Feb 4, 8:03 pm, Daniel Pupek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Try this: > >> > > DetachedCriteria crit = > >> > > DetachedCriteria.For<Category>() > >> > > .SetCacheable(true) > >> > > .AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder", true)); > >> > > Category[] categories = ActiveRecordMediator<Category>.FindAll(); > > >> > > On a side not why are you trying to pull all categories? Just pull them > >> > as > >> > > they are needed (using find by primary key)...they will be cached as > >> > > they > >> > > are pulled and subsequent calls will get the cached version. > > >> > > Dan > > >> > > Checkout my blog @http://blog.agilejedi.com > >> > > Checkout my homepage @http://www.agilejedi.com > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > Okay I got this to work with this set of code: > > >> > > > ISessionFactoryHolder holder = > >> > > > ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder(); > >> > > > ISession session = holder.CreateSession(typeof(Category)); > >> > > > ICriteria crit = session.CreateCriteria(typeof(Category)); > >> > > > crit.SetCacheable(true); > >> > > > crit.AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder",true)); > >> > > > IList list = crit.List(); > >> > > > Category[] defaultCategories = new Category[list.Count]; > >> > > > list.CopyTo(defaultCategories, 0); > > >> > > > I feel like this is too many lines of code, is there some built in AR > >> > > > functions. I feel like there should be something in AR > >> > > > like: > > >> > > > Criteria crit = Category.CreateCriteria(); (a method of > >> > > > ActiveRecordBase<Category>) > >> > > > crit.SetCacheable(true); > >> > > > crit.AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder",true)); > >> > > > Category.FindAll(crit); > > >> > > > or even better, overloads for find all > > >> > > > FindAll(bool cacheable) > > >> > > > Maybe I'm missing something.... > > >> > > > On Feb 4, 5:11 pm, jasonsirota <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > So Ayende, > > >> > > > > Why isn't FindAll() cacheable? It seems like any time you'd want to > >> > do > >> > > > > a FindAll(), you'd want them to be cacheable...shouldn't all the > >> > > > > activerecord generated queries be associated to a cache region, or > >> > are > >> > > > > they already? > > >> > > > > Jason > > >> > > > > On Feb 3, 6:20 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > > you need to enable query caching as well, and you need to mark > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > query as > >> > > > > > cachable. > >> > > > > > I don't think you can do it using FindAll > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:41 AM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > For reference, here's my config: > > >> > > > > > > <activerecord isWeb="true" isDebug="false" > > >> > threadinfotype="Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.Scopes.HybridWebThreadScopeInfo, > >> > > > > > > Castle.ActiveRecord"> > >> > > > > > > <config> > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.driver_class" > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver" /> > >> > > > > > > <add key="dialect" > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2005Dialect" /> > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.provider" > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider" /> > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.connection_string" > >> > > > > > > value="XXX"/> > >> > > > > > > <add key="proxyfactory.factory_class" > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, > >> > > > > > > NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle" /> > >> > > > > > > <add key="cache.provider_class" > > >> > value="NHibernate.Caches.SysCache.SysCacheProvider,NHibernate.Caches.SysCache" > >> > > > > > > / > > >> > > > > > > <add key="relativeExpiration" value="300" /> > >> > > > > > > </config> > >> > > > > > > </activerecord> > > >> > > > > > > On Feb 3, 4:37 pm, jasonsirota <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > I thought that you just had to wrap it in SessionScope, and > >> > > > > > > > SessionScope is enabled for the full httprequest using the > >> > > > httpmodule > > >> > > > > > > > However, just to be safe, I wrapped it in a transaction: > > >> > > > > > > > Category[] defaultCategories; > >> > > > > > > > using (new TransactionScope(OnDispose.Commit)) > >> > > > > > > > { > >> > > > > > > > defaultCategories = Category.FindAll(); > >> > > > > > > > } > > >> > > > > > > > However, I still get the multiple db calls. > > >> > > > > > > > On Feb 3, 4:23 pm, Stefan Sedich <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > Do you not need to wrap your call to get all in a > >> > transaction? I > >> > > > > > > > > thought second level cache was only commited on commit of a > >> > > > > > > > > transaction? > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers > >> > > > > > > > > Stefan > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, jasonsirota < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > After wrestling with the trunk version of ActiveRecord > >> > > > > > > > > > and > >> > > > NHibernate > >> > > > > > > > > > and NH-Contrib version numbers I finally got cache > >> > > > > > > > > > support > >> > > > enabled > >> > > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > > > the AR project, however I'm having trouble getting it to > >> > work. > > >> > > > > > > > > > The call is something like: > > >> > > > > > > > > > Category.FindAll(new Order("SortOrder"),true) > > >> > > > > > > > > > which returns a list of category sorted by the db field > >> > > > "SortOrder". > > >> > > > > > > > > > I've enabled caching on the Category object like: > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ActiveRecord("Categories", Cache=CacheEnum.ReadOnly)] > >> > > > > > > > > > public class Category > >> > > > > > > > > > ... > > >> > > > > > > > > > However, each time the page loads, it requeries the > >> > database > >> > > > instead > >> > > > > > > > > > of pulling the resulting list from the cache. > > >> > > > > > > > > > SELECT this_.CategoryID as CategoryID4_0_, > >> > this_.Description as > >> > > > > > > > > > Descript2_4_0_, this_.SortOrder as SortOrder4_0_, > >> > this_.Type as > >> > > > > > > > > > Type4_0_ FROM BudgeterCategories this_ ORDER BY > >> > this_.SortOrder > >> > > > asc > > >> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > >> > > > > > > > > > Jason > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > Stefan Sedich > >> > > > > > > > > Software Developerhttp://weblogs.asp.net/stefansedich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
