ROTFL.
Tuna Toksöz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike Typos included to enhance the readers attention! On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:38 PM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> wrote: > > yeah but then I have to do all sorts of "unit" testing, and "robust > fault-tolerant code", who has the time? ;-) > > Jason > > On Feb 5, 8:19 am, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]> wrote: > > We accept patches, did you know ? ;-) > > > > -Markus > > > > 2009/2/5 jasonsirota <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Yes, it worked thank you for all your help, I ended up creating my own > > > static methods in inherited base classes so I can share the > > > functionality throughout the project, perhaps this isn't any cleaner, > > > but it makes me FEEL better :D > > > > > public static T[] FindAll(bool cacheable) > > > { > > > if (!cacheable) > > > return FindAll(); > > > else > > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > > .SetCacheable(cacheable)); > > > } > > > > > public static T[] FindAll(Order order, bool cacheable) > > > { > > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > > .SetCacheable(cacheable) > > > .AddOrder(order)); > > > } > > > > > public static T[] FindAll(Order[] orders, bool cacheable) > > > { > > > return FindAll(DetachedCriteria.For<T>() > > > .SetCacheable(cacheable),orders); > > > } > > > > > On Feb 4, 8:20 pm, Daniel Pupek <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> You'll use the detached criterion a lot. Don't worry if the criterion > syntax > > >> seems a bit odd. You'll pick it up fast. For SQL junkies HQL tends to > go > > >> down a bit easier...I hear that hql exhibits a little better > performance but > > >> we haven't noticed a difference. > > >> A couple notes though, you can't resuse a DetachedCriteria once it has > been > > >> passed to activerecord. You can call .Clone though to get a replica of > it. > > >> Don't try to over optimize things on your own by using the session or > static > > >> properties. You just end up stepping on top of what Nhibernate is > doing for > > >> you. Nhibernate and active record have some interest ways to control > the > > >> caching...you just have to play with it a bit and in the long run > you'll be > > >> a lot happier. > > > > >> Don't worry about opening and closing sessions....ActiveRecord does a > fair > > >> bit of the session handling for you. You'll just end up creating a > bunch of > > >> Stack Overflows. If you have a non-trivial situation and believe you > need to > > >> circumvent the automatic session scopes then place your code inside of > a > > >> using statement: > > > > >> using(new SessionScope()) > > >> { > > > > >> Do some active record stuff here! > > > > >> } > > > > >> ActiveRecord will generally try to use the last sessionscope > opened...the > > >> using statement ensures it is disposed properly. > > > > >> Dan > > > > >> Checkout my blog @http://blog.agilejedi.com > > >> Checkout my homepage @http://www.agilejedi.com > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> > Interesting, that does seem easier. I thought there might be > something > > >> > with DC but I couldn't figure out how to create one. > > > > >> > The reason I'm pulling all and caching is every page has a > > >> > "Categories" dropdown list that's needed before any dynamic items > are > > >> > pulled from the database. So I could just pull the Name/ID pairs for > > >> > the dropdown list, populate it into a hash and cache it, but I know > I > > >> > will need the category objects anyway and the overhead of > pre-caching > > >> > the full list on application load is pretty low. > > > > >> > Jason > > > > >> > On Feb 4, 8:03 pm, Daniel Pupek <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > Try this: > > >> > > DetachedCriteria crit = > > >> > > DetachedCriteria.For<Category>() > > >> > > .SetCacheable(true) > > >> > > .AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder", true)); > > >> > > Category[] categories = ActiveRecordMediator<Category>.FindAll(); > > > > >> > > On a side not why are you trying to pull all categories? Just pull > them > > >> > as > > >> > > they are needed (using find by primary key)...they will be cached > as they > > >> > > are pulled and subsequent calls will get the cached version. > > > > >> > > Dan > > > > >> > > Checkout my blog @http://blog.agilejedi.com > > >> > > Checkout my homepage @http://www.agilejedi.com > > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, jasonsirota <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > Okay I got this to work with this set of code: > > > > >> > > > ISessionFactoryHolder holder = > > >> > > > ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder(); > > >> > > > ISession session = > holder.CreateSession(typeof(Category)); > > >> > > > ICriteria crit = > session.CreateCriteria(typeof(Category)); > > >> > > > crit.SetCacheable(true); > > >> > > > crit.AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder",true)); > > >> > > > IList list = crit.List(); > > >> > > > Category[] defaultCategories = new > Category[list.Count]; > > >> > > > list.CopyTo(defaultCategories, 0); > > > > >> > > > I feel like this is too many lines of code, is there some built > in AR > > >> > > > functions. I feel like there should be something in AR > > >> > > > like: > > > > >> > > > Criteria crit = Category.CreateCriteria(); (a method of > > >> > > > ActiveRecordBase<Category>) > > >> > > > crit.SetCacheable(true); > > >> > > > crit.AddOrder(new Order("SortOrder",true)); > > >> > > > Category.FindAll(crit); > > > > >> > > > or even better, overloads for find all > > > > >> > > > FindAll(bool cacheable) > > > > >> > > > Maybe I'm missing something.... > > > > >> > > > On Feb 4, 5:11 pm, jasonsirota <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > So Ayende, > > > > >> > > > > Why isn't FindAll() cacheable? It seems like any time you'd > want to > > >> > do > > >> > > > > a FindAll(), you'd want them to be cacheable...shouldn't all > the > > >> > > > > activerecord generated queries be associated to a cache > region, or > > >> > are > > >> > > > > they already? > > > > >> > > > > Jason > > > > >> > > > > On Feb 3, 6:20 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > you need to enable query caching as well, and you need to > mark the > > >> > > > query as > > >> > > > > > cachable. > > >> > > > > > I don't think you can do it using FindAll > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:41 AM, jasonsirota < > [email protected]> > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > For reference, here's my config: > > > > >> > > > > > > <activerecord isWeb="true" isDebug="false" > > > > >> > > threadinfotype="Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.Scopes.HybridWebThreadScopeInfo, > > >> > > > > > > Castle.ActiveRecord"> > > >> > > > > > > <config> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.driver_class" > > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver" /> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="dialect" > > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2005Dialect" /> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.provider" > > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider" /> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="connection.connection_string" > value="XXX"/> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="proxyfactory.factory_class" > > >> > > > > > > value="NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, > > >> > > > > > > NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle" /> > > >> > > > > > > <add key="cache.provider_class" > > > > >> > > value="NHibernate.Caches.SysCache.SysCacheProvider,NHibernate.Caches.SysCache" > > >> > > > > > > / > > > > >> > > > > > > <add key="relativeExpiration" value="300" /> > > >> > > > > > > </config> > > >> > > > > > > </activerecord> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Feb 3, 4:37 pm, jasonsirota <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > I thought that you just had to wrap it in SessionScope, > and > > >> > > > > > > > SessionScope is enabled for the full httprequest using > the > > >> > > > httpmodule > > > > >> > > > > > > > However, just to be safe, I wrapped it in a transaction: > > > > >> > > > > > > > Category[] defaultCategories; > > >> > > > > > > > using (new > TransactionScope(OnDispose.Commit)) > > >> > > > > > > > { > > >> > > > > > > > defaultCategories = Category.FindAll(); > > >> > > > > > > > } > > > > >> > > > > > > > However, I still get the multiple db calls. > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Feb 3, 4:23 pm, Stefan Sedich < > [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Do you not need to wrap your call to get all in a > > >> > transaction? I > > >> > > > > > > > > thought second level cache was only commited on commit > of a > > >> > > > > > > > > transaction? > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers > > >> > > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, jasonsirota < > > >> > > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > After wrestling with the trunk version of > ActiveRecord and > > >> > > > NHibernate > > >> > > > > > > > > > and NH-Contrib version numbers I finally got cache > support > > >> > > > enabled > > >> > > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > > > the AR project, however I'm having trouble getting > it to > > >> > work. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The call is something like: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Category.FindAll(new Order("SortOrder"),true) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > which returns a list of category sorted by the db > field > > >> > > > "SortOrder". > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I've enabled caching on the Category object like: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ActiveRecord("Categories", > Cache=CacheEnum.ReadOnly)] > > >> > > > > > > > > > public class Category > > >> > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > However, each time the page loads, it requeries the > > >> > database > > >> > > > instead > > >> > > > > > > > > > of pulling the resulting list from the cache. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > SELECT this_.CategoryID as CategoryID4_0_, > > >> > this_.Description as > > >> > > > > > > > > > Descript2_4_0_, this_.SortOrder as SortOrder4_0_, > > >> > this_.Type as > > >> > > > > > > > > > Type4_0_ FROM BudgeterCategories this_ ORDER BY > > >> > this_.SortOrder > > >> > > > asc > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > >> > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > > > Stefan Sedich > > >> > > > > > > > > Software Developerhttp://weblogs.asp.net/stefansedich > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
