Hi Craig, with the first approach I get: Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.ComponentActivatorException: Could not find a public constructor for the type ISomeService in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateInstance(CreationContext context, Object[] arguments, Type[] signature) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.Resolve(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler handler, Type service, IDictionary additionalArguments) in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.get_Item(Type service) in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service) in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve<T>() in uNHAddIns.Examples.CustomInterceptor.CustomerTest.Product_Raise_Property_Change() en SomeTest.cs: line 43 <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D43%26column%3D1>
With the second approach I get: Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentRegistrationException: Type ISomeService is abstract. As such, it is not possible to instansiate it as implementation of ISomeService service in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateInstance(CreationContext context, Object[] arguments, Type[] signature) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.Resolve(CreationContext context) in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler handler, Type service, IDictionary additionalArguments) in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.get_Item(Type service) in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service) in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve<T>() in uNHAddIns.Examples.CustomInterceptor.CustomerTest.Product_Raise_Property_Change() en Some <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D43%26column%3D1>Test.cs: line 51 <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D51%26column%3D1> Thank you. Craig Neuwirt escribió: > What error do yo get? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, JoseFR <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Is there a way to register a proxy service in the container without > target. I'm looking for something like this: > > container.Register(Component.For<ISomeService>() > .Interceptors(new InterceptorReference(typeof > (SomeInterceptor)), > new InterceptorReference > (typeof(OtherInterceptor))) > .First); > > even I try with: > > container.Register(Component.For<ISomeService>() > > .UsingFactoryMethod > (() => > { > var proxyGen = new > Castle.DynamicProxy.ProxyGenerator(); > return (IProduct) > proxyGen.CreateInterfaceProxyWithoutTarget( > typeof > (ISomeService), > new > SomeInterceptor(), > new > OtherInterceptor()); > })); > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
