Ok, you can now do the former on trunk On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:03 PM, "José F. Romaniello" <[email protected] > wrote:
> > will be great! > > For the other hand, calling "UsingFactoryMethod" without adding the > "FactorySupportFacility" should throw an exception somewhere? > > thank you again Craig and Tuna. > > > Craig Neuwirt escribió: > > I suspect you need to indicate that a target should be ommitted. This > > needs to be done on the ComponentModel via > > > > var options = ProxyUtil.ObtainProxyOptions(model, true); > > options.OmitTarget = true > > > > Unfortunately, this is not well exposed through the registration > > interface, but I'll see if I can incorporate that automatically if > > interceptors are registered for a model with interface or abstract > > implementation or explicitly on interceptors descriptor. > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:31 PM, "José F. Romaniello" > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Craig, with the first approach I get: > > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.ComponentActivatorException: > > Could not find a public constructor for the type > > ISomeService > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateInstance(CreationContext > > context, Object[] arguments, Type[] signature) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.Resolve(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler > > handler, Type service, IDictionary additionalArguments) > > in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.get_Item(Type service) > > in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service) > > in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve<T>() > > in > > > uNHAddIns.Examples.CustomInterceptor.CustomerTest.Product_Raise_Property_Change() > > en SomeTest.cs: line 43 > > > <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D43%26column%3D1> > > > > > > With the second approach I get: > > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentRegistrationException: Type ISomeService > > is abstract. > > As such, it is not possible to instansiate it as implementation of > > ISomeService service > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.CreateInstance(CreationContext > > context, Object[] arguments, Type[] signature) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.Instantiate(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > > Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.Resolve(CreationContext > > context) > > in > > Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler > > handler, Type service, IDictionary additionalArguments) > > in Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.get_Item(Type service) > > in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service) > > in Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve<T>() > > in > > > uNHAddIns.Examples.CustomInterceptor.CustomerTest.Product_Raise_Property_Change() > > en Some > > > <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D43%26column%3D1>Test.cs: > > line 51 > > > <about:file%3A%2F%2F16CDF63B-1D9F-49EF-BEBA-F01ADA594882%2Ff%3ACustomerTest.cs%3Fline%3D51%26column%3D1> > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Craig Neuwirt escribió: > > > What error do yo get? > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, JoseFR <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to register a proxy service in the container > > without > > > target. I'm looking for something like this: > > > > > > container.Register(Component.For<ISomeService>() > > > .Interceptors(new > > InterceptorReference(typeof > > > (SomeInterceptor)), > > > new > > InterceptorReference > > > (typeof(OtherInterceptor))) > > > .First); > > > > > > even I try with: > > > > > > container.Register(Component.For<ISomeService>() > > > > > > .UsingFactoryMethod > > > (() => > > > { > > > var > > proxyGen = new > > > Castle.DynamicProxy.ProxyGenerator(); > > > return > > (IProduct) > > > proxyGen.CreateInterfaceProxyWithoutTarget( > > > typeof > > > (ISomeService), > > > new > > > SomeInterceptor(), > > > new > > > OtherInterceptor()); > > > })); > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
