you won't always have the same name (maybe not even the same controller). consider the list/add/ (GET/POST/) RESTful urls on resource roots
/my/resource => Get wil goo to List(), POST to Add() (that might be on an Admin Controller) my/resource/1 => GET goes to Get(), DELETE goes to Remove() (that might be on an Admin Controller) anyhoo, I think I'll through this in. no breaking changes and all. I thought more people would have found it useful and have input on the suggested API (I started with .With(Verb) but Restrict is more in-line with the Routing API On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote: > > You can have 2 methods with AccessibleThrough attribute. > Eg. > > [AccessibleThrough(Verb.Get)] > public void AddGroups() > > [AccessibleThrough(Verb.Post)] > public void AddGroups(List<string> groups) > > The first method will respond to gets and the second will respond to > posts. > > John > > On Jul 1, 10:48 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > > same url points to two different methods. => two routes. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I wouldn't have thought that the http method had anything to do with > > > routing. > > > > > What is wrong with the AccessibleThrough attribute since only the > > > controller really knows how you should use it, or did I miss the > important > > > point? > > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> do you think it's useful? do you have another way to achieve this? > > > > >> eg.: > > > > >> var barsListRoute = new PatternRoute("BarsList", "/bars") > .DefaultForController.Is("bars") > > >> .DefaultForAction.Is("list") > > >> .RestrictTo(Verbs.Get | Verbs.Head); > > > > >> var newBarRoute = new PatternRoute("NewBar", "/bars") > .DefaultForController.Is("bars") > > >> .DefaultForAction.Is("new") > > >> .RestrictTo(Verbs.Post); > > > > >> var barRoute = new PatternRoute("Bar", "/bars/<barId>") > .DefaultForController.Is("bars") > > >> .DefaultForAction.Is("show") > > >> .RestrictTo(Verbs.Get | Verbs.Head); > > > > >> var updateBarRoute = new PatternRoute("UpdateBar", "/bars/<barId>") > > >> .DefaultForController.Is("bars") > > >> .DefaultForAction.Is("update") > > >> .RestrictTo(Verbs.Put); > > > > >> I have an implementation ready. waiting for input. > > > > >> -- > > >> Ken Egozi. > > >>http://www.kenegozi.com/blog > > >>http://www.delver.com > > >>http://www.musicglue.com > > >>http://www.castleproject.org > > >>http://www.gotfriends.co.il > > > > > -- > > > Jono > > > > -- > > Ken Egozi. > http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
