usually it does not make sense, definitely not in strict REST semantics.  I
see no point in preventing that though, as it might come in handy on several
scenarios

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Interesting, I didn't see it that way.
> I can now see some use for it :)
> Are you going to restrict the Verb combination?
> Eg.
> .RestrictTo(Verbs.Post | Verbs.Get); -> Doesn't make sense!
>
> John
>
> On Jul 2, 6:23 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > you won't always have the same name (maybe not even the same controller).
> > consider the list/add/ (GET/POST/) RESTful urls on resource roots
> >
> > /my/resource => Get wil goo to List(), POST to Add() (that might be on an
> > Admin Controller)
> > my/resource/1 => GET goes to Get(), DELETE goes to Remove() (that might
> be
> > on an Admin Controller)
> >
> > anyhoo, I think I'll through this in.  no breaking changes and all.  I
> > thought more people would have found it useful and have input on the
> > suggested API (I started with .With(Verb)  but Restrict is more in-line
> with
> > the Routing API
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, John Simons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > You can have 2 methods with AccessibleThrough attribute.
> > > Eg.
> >
> > > [AccessibleThrough(Verb.Get)]
> > > public void AddGroups()
> >
> > > [AccessibleThrough(Verb.Post)]
> > > public void AddGroups(List<string> groups)
> >
> > > The first method will respond to gets and the second will respond to
> > > posts.
> >
> > > John
> >
> > > On Jul 1, 10:48 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > same url points to two different methods. => two routes.
> >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't have thought that the http method had anything to do
> with
> > > > > routing.
> >
> > > > > What is wrong with the AccessibleThrough attribute since only the
> > > > > controller really knows how you should use it, or did I miss the
> > > important
> > > > > point?
> >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> do you think it's useful? do you have another way to achieve this?
> >
> > > > >> eg.:
> >
> > > > >> var barsListRoute = new PatternRoute("BarsList", "/bars")
> > >  .DefaultForController.Is("bars")
> > > > >>   .DefaultForAction.Is("list")
> > > > >>   .RestrictTo(Verbs.Get | Verbs.Head);
> >
> > > > >> var newBarRoute = new PatternRoute("NewBar", "/bars")
> > >  .DefaultForController.Is("bars")
> > > > >>   .DefaultForAction.Is("new")
> > > > >>   .RestrictTo(Verbs.Post);
> >
> > > > >> var barRoute = new PatternRoute("Bar", "/bars/<barId>")
> > >  .DefaultForController.Is("bars")
> > > > >>   .DefaultForAction.Is("show")
> > > > >>   .RestrictTo(Verbs.Get | Verbs.Head);
> >
> > > > >> var updateBarRoute = new PatternRoute("UpdateBar",
> "/bars/<barId>")
> > > > >>   .DefaultForController.Is("bars")
> > > > >>   .DefaultForAction.Is("update")
> > > > >>   .RestrictTo(Verbs.Put);
> >
> > > > >> I have an implementation ready. waiting for input.
> >
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Ken Egozi.
> > > > >>http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> > > > >>http://www.delver.com
> > > > >>http://www.musicglue.com
> > > > >>http://www.castleproject.org
> > > > >>http://www.gotfriends.co.il
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jono
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Ken Egozi.
> > >http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.
> ..
> >
> > --
> > Ken Egozi.
> http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il
> >
>


-- 
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.delver.com
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.gotfriends.co.il

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to