Gave it a shot Roelof. Got all of the SVN trunks pulled down and the directory structure set up. Step 5 is where I go sideways because I don't have NAnt. Tried the build.cmd in the buildscript directory, but I get an MSBuild error "Only one project can be specified." I even opened up the solution in the src directory in DevSutdio and tried to build. Get a bunch of Warnings as Errors ... varying things are not CLS-compliant in one both of the log projects in the solution. Probably not a huge issue since I did get a clean Core build, but I'm not sure exactly how to specify the build options needed ... the -D options from the command line tools ... so the build of Core I got probably wouldn't work anyway.
So, I now come to a question ... do I need to install Nant to run the build from the command line? I'd really rather not keep loading more and more software on my computer just to be able to build this one thing. I normally don't delve this far off into OSS land, and loading up all of the OS build toolsets for this one project wouldn't be my first choice as a solution to my problem. I appreciate your help and I'll continue to monitor the group for any updates. Cheers, B On Feb 16, 8:36 am, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Roelof. I'll give this a go tonight after work > and post my results here. > Regards, > B > > On Feb 16, 2:54 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > To build Windsor with APTCA you'll need to jump through the following hoops: > > > 1. svn cohttps://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/Core/trunkCore > > 2. svn > > cohttps://svn.castleproject.org/svn/Castle/DynamicProxy/trunkDynamicProxy > > 3. svn co > > https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/Castle/InversionOfControl/trunkInve... > > 4. cd Core > > 5. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > 6. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Core.* > > ..\DynamicProxy\lib\net-3.5 > > 7. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Core.* > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > 8. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Services.* > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > 9. cd ..\DynamicProxy > > 10. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > 11. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.DynamicProxy2.* > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > 12. cd ..\InversionOfControl > > 13. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > > You can find the APTCA assemblies in > > InversionOfControl\build\net-3.5\release. > > Please let me know if this worked for you. > > > I am the first to agree that this is a lot work, and back before we split > > the trunk into individual projects, with binary instead of source > > dependencies, this used to be a lot easier. I don't know if hornget > > <http://code.google.com/p/hornget/>has a mode to build with APTCA. > > > -- Roelof. > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply Hammett. > > > > Thing is, it's just frustrating to get jazzed about something, then > > > not be able to put it into play. I'm fairly stoked about MVC and I can > > > do it without IoC, but I'd really rather not. I'm sure the > > > implications of running medium vs. full trust are significant, but as > > > far as I can tell from my blog browsing the last few days after work, > > > there seem to be a large number of providers running under medium > > > trust. I'm personally using godaddy (for now ... but probably not for > > > long) and it seems there are many others. At least now I know one more > > > thing to ask about when I'm shopping other hosts. > > > > As for my current situation, it seems it would be better for someone > > > familiar with the project to run a stable build with the partial trust > > > setting rather than having someone completely unfamiliar with the code > > > base trying to fire one off. I know the idea behind OS it to get > > > people involved, but I just pulled down around 150 MB of code and dlls > > > that I've never seen before and ran a build process that I obviously > > > don't know how to diagnose problems with. It seems too that with the > > > amount of dialog I've read on it, there are going to be people (like > > > me) that don't know what they are doing flubbing the build in growing > > > numbers. And the MS MVC dlls that I had to bin deploy seem fine ... so > > > I assume they are ok with medium trust. > > > > And, I'm not trying to bag on the contributors. Castle seems pretty > > > top notch and introduces a cool new way to do things. But, a partial > > > trust build would sure hit the spot. :) > > > > Anyway, I'll keep an eye on this chain and hopefully have some free > > > time this week to try and get a good build going with the appropriate > > > flags. It's just a really time consuming process ... > > > > Cheers, > > > B > > > > On Feb 16, 12:18 am, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I hear you, but it's not a simple solution. It wont matter if us aptca > > > > all our code, our dependencies (and their dependencies) also need to > > > > do it. Security is pervasive thing and so far OSS projects dont seem > > > > to be paying much attention to it. aptca has a big security > > > > implication, that's why I think the castle team doesnt provide a > > > > ready-to-use build with it. > > > > > The simplest solution is security transparency, but even that is > > > > complicated in .net 3.5. In v4.0 things got simplified and I'm hoping > > > > castle team will make an effort to adopt it and persuade others to do > > > > the same, as to lower the amount of hassle it creates for our users. > > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Guys, I'm trying to learn MS MVC. I bought Steve Sanderson's book Pro > > > > > MVC which praises Castle throughout most of the book. It is all slick > > > > > and works well on my local machine. I've really enjoyed learning the > > > > > basics of IoC. Problem: As soon as I try to deploy to a medium trust > > > > > environment, no go. > > > > > > I've spent the last two days trying to figure out a way to get this > > > > > going. I've read countless posts, googled till I can google no more, > > > > > and all signs point to a full rebuild of the Castle project. Now, > > > > > frankly, that's more than I bargained for with the purchase of the > > > > > book, but I like the technology and I'm a developer ... I know how to > > > > > use SVN ... what the hey right? The link I originally found on this > > > > > group here (http://tinyurl.com/yhj5yga) posted by 'Roelof' pointed me > > > > > to an SVN location. I grabbed the code, ran the build command and it > > > > > all blowed up on the same error the above poster is having. So now I'm > > > > > really getting frustrated. I really don't have the time to debug the > > > > > reasons I can't grab a large base of code off the net and get it to > > > > > build on my crappy home Vista box. I'm sure the reasons are many and > > > > > varied. Mark, from above, has made it farther than I could in a week. > > > > > > So, my question is this. Would it be at all possible to get someone > > > > > involved in this project to create a medium trust build and post it to > > > > > the project site? It seems to be a fairly common request. > > > > > > You'd be hooking all of us medium-trust-crappy-host-service-provider- > > > > > having-slugs up and we'd really owe you one. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > B > > > > > > On Feb 15, 10:51 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> What's the best way to check whether APTCA is being applied? > > > > > >> So far I've been testing for it through trial and error as I'm not > > > > >> aware of a better way... > > > > > >> If I use a build without the -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted- > > > > >> callers=true argument when I try to use active record in medium trust > > > > >> I get a SecurityException at: > > > > > >> IConfigurationSource source = ActiveRecordSectionHandler.Instance; > > > > > >> With the allow-partially-trusted-callers=true it makes it to the line > > > > >> in ActiveRecordStarter.cs that I referenced in my earlier post. > > > > > >> I've tried adding [assembly: AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute] > > > > >> to > > > > >> the ActiveRecordModelBuilder.cs file but when I try to compile it, I > > > > >> receive the compile error: > > > > > >> CS0579: Duplicate 'AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute' > > > > > >> Thanks in advance, > > > > >> Mark > > > > > >> On Feb 15, 7:56 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote:> Could you > > > check whether the APTCA is being applied to the > > > > >> > castle.activerecord.dll? > > > > > >> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Mark <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > I've gone through and built Castle.Core, Castle.ActiveRecord, and > > > > >> > > Castle.DynamicProxy with > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Cheers, > > > > >> > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Castle Project Users" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]> > > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > > groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers, > > > > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/-Hidequoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.- Hide quoted > > >text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
