Using horn is easier, once you've got it setup. To get the latest released version of AR use *horn -install:castle.activerecord -version:2.1.2 -mode:aptca*
When it's done you can find the AR assemblies in *C:\hornget\.horn\ioc\castle.activerecord\Working-2.1.2\build\net-3.5\aptca* -- Roelof. On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Mauricio Scheffer < [email protected]> wrote: > These would be the steps to build with horn: > Install msysgit: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/list > Clone horn: git clone --depth 1 git://github.com/dagda1/horn_src.git > Build horn by running hornbuild.bat > Add c:\Program Files\Git\cmd to your path > Run horn -install:castle.activerecord -mode:aptca > > On Feb 17, 8:50 pm, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mauricio, > > I don't currently have git on my home PC. > > > > Roelof, > > Would this be an easier path to where I need to be? Install git and > > grab this from horn rather than installing Nant and running the build > > from the subversion repository? > > > > Thanks guys, > > B > > > > On Feb 17, 6:40 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Did you try horn? It already includes nant and it takes care of all > > > dependencies, DLL copying, etc. > > > > > On Feb 17, 1:02 am, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Gave it a shot Roelof. Got all of the SVN trunks pulled down and the > > > > directory structure set up. Step 5 is where I go sideways because I > > > > don't have NAnt. Tried the build.cmd in the buildscript directory, > but > > > > I get an MSBuild error "Only one project can be specified." I even > > > > opened up the solution in the src directory in DevSutdio and tried to > > > > build. Get a bunch of Warnings as Errors ... varying things are not > > > > CLS-compliant in one both of the log projects in the solution. > > > > Probably not a huge issue since I did get a clean Core build, but I'm > > > > not sure exactly how to specify the build options needed ... the -D > > > > options from the command line tools ... so the build of Core I got > > > > probably wouldn't work anyway. > > > > > > So, I now come to a question ... do I need to install Nant to run the > > > > build from the command line? I'd really rather not keep loading more > > > > and more software on my computer just to be able to build this one > > > > thing. I normally don't delve this far off into OSS land, and loading > > > > up all of the OS build toolsets for this one project wouldn't be my > > > > first choice as a solution to my problem. > > > > > > I appreciate your help and I'll continue to monitor the group for any > > > > updates. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > B > > > > > > On Feb 16, 8:36 am, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply Roelof. I'll give this a go tonight after work > > > > > and post my results here. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > B > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 2:54 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > To build Windsor with APTCA you'll need to jump through the > following hoops: > > > > > > > > 1. svn cohttps:// > svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/Core/trunkCore > > > > > > 2. svn cohttps:// > svn.castleproject.org/svn/Castle/DynamicProxy/trunkDynamicProxy > > > > > > 3. svn co > > > > > > > https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/Castle/InversionOfControl/trunkInve... > > > > > > 4. cd Core > > > > > > 5. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > > > > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > > > > > 6. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Core.* > > > > > > ..\DynamicProxy\lib\net-3.5 > > > > > > 7. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Core.* > > > > > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > > > > > 8. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.Services.* > > > > > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > > > > > 9. cd ..\DynamicProxy > > > > > > 10. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > > > > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > > > > > 11. copy /y build\net-3.5\release\Castle.DynamicProxy2.* > > > > > > ..\InversionOfControl\lib\net-3.5 > > > > > > 12. cd ..\InversionOfControl > > > > > > 13. nant -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > > > > > -D:common.run-tests=false -D:project.config=release > > > > > > > > You can find the APTCA assemblies in > > > > > > InversionOfControl\build\net-3.5\release. > > > > > > Please let me know if this worked for you. > > > > > > > > I am the first to agree that this is a lot work, and back before > we split > > > > > > the trunk into individual projects, with binary instead of source > > > > > > dependencies, this used to be a lot easier. I don't know if > hornget > > > > > > <http://code.google.com/p/hornget/>has a mode to build with > APTCA. > > > > > > > > -- Roelof. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM, BSP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply Hammett. > > > > > > > > > Thing is, it's just frustrating to get jazzed about something, > then > > > > > > > not be able to put it into play. I'm fairly stoked about MVC > and I can > > > > > > > do it without IoC, but I'd really rather not. I'm sure the > > > > > > > implications of running medium vs. full trust are significant, > but as > > > > > > > far as I can tell from my blog browsing the last few days after > work, > > > > > > > there seem to be a large number of providers running under > medium > > > > > > > trust. I'm personally using godaddy (for now ... but probably > not for > > > > > > > long) and it seems there are many others. At least now I know > one more > > > > > > > thing to ask about when I'm shopping other hosts. > > > > > > > > > As for my current situation, it seems it would be better for > someone > > > > > > > familiar with the project to run a stable build with the > partial trust > > > > > > > setting rather than having someone completely unfamiliar with > the code > > > > > > > base trying to fire one off. I know the idea behind OS it to > get > > > > > > > people involved, but I just pulled down around 150 MB of code > and dlls > > > > > > > that I've never seen before and ran a build process that I > obviously > > > > > > > don't know how to diagnose problems with. It seems too that > with the > > > > > > > amount of dialog I've read on it, there are going to be people > (like > > > > > > > me) that don't know what they are doing flubbing the build in > growing > > > > > > > numbers. And the MS MVC dlls that I had to bin deploy seem fine > ... so > > > > > > > I assume they are ok with medium trust. > > > > > > > > > And, I'm not trying to bag on the contributors. Castle seems > pretty > > > > > > > top notch and introduces a cool new way to do things. But, a > partial > > > > > > > trust build would sure hit the spot. :) > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I'll keep an eye on this chain and hopefully have some > free > > > > > > > time this week to try and get a good build going with the > appropriate > > > > > > > flags. It's just a really time consuming process ... > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > B > > > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 12:18 am, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I hear you, but it's not a simple solution. It wont matter if > us aptca > > > > > > > > all our code, our dependencies (and their dependencies) also > need to > > > > > > > > do it. Security is pervasive thing and so far OSS projects > dont seem > > > > > > > > to be paying much attention to it. aptca has a big security > > > > > > > > implication, that's why I think the castle team doesnt > provide a > > > > > > > > ready-to-use build with it. > > > > > > > > > > The simplest solution is security transparency, but even that > is > > > > > > > > complicated in .net 3.5. In v4.0 things got simplified and > I'm hoping > > > > > > > > castle team will make an effort to adopt it and persuade > others to do > > > > > > > > the same, as to lower the amount of hassle it creates for our > users. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, BSP <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Guys, I'm trying to learn MS MVC. I bought Steve > Sanderson's book Pro > > > > > > > > > MVC which praises Castle throughout most of the book. It is > all slick > > > > > > > > > and works well on my local machine. I've really enjoyed > learning the > > > > > > > > > basics of IoC. Problem: As soon as I try to deploy to a > medium trust > > > > > > > > > environment, no go. > > > > > > > > > > > I've spent the last two days trying to figure out a way to > get this > > > > > > > > > going. I've read countless posts, googled till I can google > no more, > > > > > > > > > and all signs point to a full rebuild of the Castle > project. Now, > > > > > > > > > frankly, that's more than I bargained for with the purchase > of the > > > > > > > > > book, but I like the technology and I'm a developer ... I > know how to > > > > > > > > > use SVN ... what the hey right? The link I originally found > on this > > > > > > > > > group here (http://tinyurl.com/yhj5yga) posted by 'Roelof' > pointed me > > > > > > > > > to an SVN location. I grabbed the code, ran the build > command and it > > > > > > > > > all blowed up on the same error the above poster is having. > So now I'm > > > > > > > > > really getting frustrated. I really don't have the time to > debug the > > > > > > > > > reasons I can't grab a large base of code off the net and > get it to > > > > > > > > > build on my crappy home Vista box. I'm sure the reasons are > many and > > > > > > > > > varied. Mark, from above, has made it farther than I could > in a week. > > > > > > > > > > > So, my question is this. Would it be at all possible to get > someone > > > > > > > > > involved in this project to create a medium trust build and > post it to > > > > > > > > > the project site? It seems to be a fairly common request. > > > > > > > > > > > You'd be hooking all of us > medium-trust-crappy-host-service-provider- > > > > > > > > > having-slugs up and we'd really owe you one. > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > B > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 15, 10:51 pm, Mark <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> What's the best way to check whether APTCA is being > applied? > > > > > > > > > > >> So far I've been testing for it through trial and error as > I'm not > > > > > > > > >> aware of a better way... > > > > > > > > > > >> If I use a build without the > -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted- > > > > > > > > >> callers=true argument when I try to use active record in > medium trust > > > > > > > > >> I get a SecurityException at: > > > > > > > > > > >> IConfigurationSource source = > ActiveRecordSectionHandler.Instance; > > > > > > > > > > >> With the allow-partially-trusted-callers=true it makes it > to the line > > > > > > > > >> in ActiveRecordStarter.cs that I referenced in my earlier > post. > > > > > > > > > > >> I've tried adding [assembly: > AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute] to > > > > > > > > >> the ActiveRecordModelBuilder.cs file but when I try to > compile it, I > > > > > > > > >> receive the compile error: > > > > > > > > > > >> CS0579: Duplicate 'AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute' > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > >> Mark > > > > > > > > > > >> On Feb 15, 7:56 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote:> > Could you > > > > > > > check whether the APTCA is being applied to the > > > > > > > > >> > castle.activerecord.dll?... > > > > read more ยป > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
