Yes, this would be for Monorail vNext.
And yes I know Monorail contains an internal container (but this is
not a fully fledge IoC container), so what I want to gather from this
poll is if we should ship a real container (and since we have Windsor,
that would be my choice) with Monorail out of the box.

Cheers
John

On Feb 25, 6:32 am, Alex Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think if Monorail v.Next did require IoC I don't think it would do any
> harm - with the emergence of ASP.Net MVC, and that fact it works on mono as
> well - it seems like the audience for Monorail has been reduced, such that
> people selecting the framework are probably the "running with scissors"
> type.
>
> It should also make things simpler in many respects i.e. currently the
> monorail container can have services which aren't available to your IoC
> container, so you need to manually register them etc.
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I know of at least two websites (not too small, but not too large also)
> > that run MR without IoC.
>
> > The reasoning behind those was resistance from Management (for the first)
> > and Client (for the second) to adopt more than one new concept (I'm talking
> > 2006 here), so an MVC was more than enough for them to chew on.
> > Add to that my personal lack of understanding of the IoC world back then,
> > and you end up with applications that are not too bad, even though could
> > have benefited from a full featured IoC.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jason Meckley 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> agreed, MR should default to use an IoC. Taking that question one step
> >> further; does anyone use MR without an IoC? If not, why not require
> >> the IoC, similar to FUBU?
>
> >> On Feb 24, 7:59 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Perhaps the question is meant for MonoRail vNext, which could be a whole
> >> > different beast.
>
> >> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <
>
> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > An old post by hammett on integrating MonoRail with other containers:
> >> > >http://hammett.castleproject.org/?p=317
>
> >> > > On Feb 24, 9:30 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > I agree with Ken, MonoRail already has a container:
> >> > >http://svn.castleproject.org:8080/svn/castle/MonoRail/trunk/src/Castl.
> >> ..
>
> >> > > > It implements IServiceProvider and has AddService methods, so it can
> >> > > > be used as a generic container.
>
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > Mauricio
>
> >> > > > On Feb 24, 8:46 am, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > isn't that what the Monorail Container is all about?
> >> > > > > plus it allow you to not use an IoC at all if you'd like it
> >> better.
>
> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:43 PM, John Simons <
> >> > > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > I agree with everything you said, I just want to be sure that
> >> the
> >> > > > > > majority of users agree too, before doing the change :)
>
> >> > > > > > Cheers
> >> > > > > > John
>
> >> > > > > > On Feb 24, 10:24 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Fact that MonoRail should be built around IoC and with IoC in
> >> mind
> >> > > is
> >> > > > > > > a no brainer IMO.
>
> >> > > > > > > It should have to have some IoC to function, but does not
> >> depend on
> >> > > > > > > any particular one.
> >> > > > > > > Much like FubuMVC, OpenRASTA, NServiceBus and other frameworks
> >> > > handle
> >> > > > > > > this.
>
> >> > > > > > > obviously by default it should ship with Windsor integration,
> >> while
> >> > > > > > > adapters for other frameworks would live in contrib.
>
> >> > > > > > > And it should never call container directly, via some sort of
> >> > > > > > > ServiceLocator abstraction.
> >> > > > > > > Where it has to pull a custom, abstract factory should be
> >> defined,
> >> > > so
> >> > > > > > > that either typed factory facility could be used,
> >> > > > > > > manually coded factory, or factory backed by any other
> >> container.
>
> >> > > > > > > On 24 Lut, 12:05, John Simons <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > To get a better understanding on what to have out of the box
> >> in
> >> > > > > > > > Monorail, I've put another poll up onhttp://
> >> twtpoll.com/zr1tt0
>
> >> > > > > > > > So if you've got a moment, and are using Monorail, please
> >> vote.
>
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > John
>
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> Google
> >> > > Groups
> >> > > > > > "Castle Project Users" group.
> >> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > > > > > .
> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
> >> <castle-project-users%[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
> >> ><castle-project-users%2Bun
> >> > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > .
> >> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Ken Egozi.
>
> >>http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue...
> >> כנס
> >> > > הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > > "Castle Project Users" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]
> >> > > .
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
> >> <castle-project-users%[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>
> >> > > .
> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Castle Project Users" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Ken Egozi.
>
> >http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> >http://www.delver.com
> >http://www.musicglue.com
> >http://www.castleproject.org
> >http://www.idcc.co.il- הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Castle Project Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
> > .
>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to