Write a facility that turn all the properties to a mandatory dependencies, so the startable facility will wait until it have everything.
Write a facility like startable, but which waits until it has the optional ones as well.
On 7/18/06, Shawn Hinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, I don't pass the logger in via a constructor, it's coming from a
property in a base class that does a lookup in the container. This makes
sense for the logger, but I do that frequently, for example, my domain
objects (I'm not using Active Record, I use iBATIS) have private
properties that refer to their DAO objects, and those DAOs are obtained
from the container in the same way (i.e.,
ApplicationContext.Current[typeof(IListingDao)] as IListingDao). Is
there any way I can satisfy these dependencies without requiring
constructor injection?
I can sort of do this by tweaking the order in which the components are
declared in the config file, but that seems a little shady to me.
If there's no way to do this with the existing Startable facility, is
there a hook that I could use to write my own that would fire all of the
Start methods after the container had completed its external
configuration? I realize that is a little sketchy given that you can
programmatically configure the container.
It's also worth mentioning that I'm coming at this from a Spring
perspective - I've used spring and spring.net for several years now and
this is my first project with castle/windsor. If I should be looking at
this from another direction, please let me know.
Thanks,
Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
hammett
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:41 PM
To: castleproject-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Castle-users] Startable facility
Shawn, the startable facilities "starts" a component whenever it's
ready, but by ready I mean whenever the component has the minimum set of
dependencies satisfied. How are you using the logging, can your
component constructors?
On 7/18/06, Shawn Hinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've looked around a little but I am still confused by something about
> the startable facility. It seems like its dependencies aren't being
> resolved. For example, my startable class uses the logging facility,
> but when it starts, the logging facility isn't present in the
container.
> What am I missing?
--
Cheers,
hammett
http://hammett.castleproject.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
CastleProject-users mailing list
CastleProject-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
CastleProject-users mailing list
CastleProject-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ CastleProject-users mailing list CastleProject-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
