On 7/18/06, Shawn Hinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's definitely a hack. Again, I'm coming from a slightly different > world. In spring, you could easily define a property-based dependency > without having to use constructor injection. I'd love to hear that I > just missed something in the documentation. I'm not averse to > constructor injection, it just wasn't my first instinct when I designed > this application so it'd require a lot of refactoring to implement.
I'm not a spring expert, but I'd say that whatever you can with it can be done with the MicroKernel, but you have to disclose some code, config, (maybe diagrams?) in order to allow us to undertand what you have, the decisions you've made, and thus be able to give you some helpfull advice. -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ CastleProject-users mailing list CastleProject-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/castleproject-users
