If a both side of a relation is not defined as dependent, they're related.
They're always cascade-loaded. But, the related will be only automatically
create/update if autoStore is set true. Otherwise, user must create/update
each related object.
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
>From: Russell, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:17 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Foreign keys
>
>Hey Thomas,
> What exactly do I have to do to make a "related" relationship.
>The docs talk about it, but there is little indication of its
>implementation. Will it autoload collections of objects for instance?.
>Thanks for your response,
>
>Glenn.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Yip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 27 July 2001 19:17
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Foreign keys
>
>
>
>
>
>>so that I can support not only one-to-many, but also
>>one-to-many in an associative context, in an aggregative context, and in a
>>compositive context (even though the latter already is supported by
>Castor).
>
>One-to-one can be both dependent and related.
>One-to-many can be both dependent and related.
>Many-to-many can only be related.
>
>
>Thomas
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
