Hi Blaine,
->
-> I'm trying to understand how the SimpleTypeFactory works. I think I
-> understand it down to loadTypesDefinitions(). That's where I
-> get lost.
This code will be deprecated and replaced by a new object model.
As you see, it is too complex...
->It looks like a mapping is created between a "string" SimpleType and a
->org.exolab.castor.builder.types.XSString type. Is this correct?
No, org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.simpletypes does not rely on
org.exolab.castor.builder, it is the other way
around ;+)
-> So if I
-> want to create a SimpleType of type "string", does it create an
-> instance of
-> XSString, or StringType?
StringType
->
-> In addition to this, I see that Schema has a createSimpleType method.
-> createSimpleType has a baseType parameter. If I don't want a
-> derived type,
-> but a "string", how do I create a SimpleType of type "string", not a
-> SimpleType derived from type "string"?
All the base type are loaded in-memory by loadTypeDefinition(), you just have to play
with them
Hope this helps,
Arnaud
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
