Re: [castor-dev] SimpleTypesFactory questions

[SOUTHAM,BLAINE (HP-FtCollins,ex1)]

The entire schema object model will be replaced, or just the simpletypes?
Any early work on this available?  Any ideas on the timeframe?

Thanks,
Blaine

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] SimpleTypesFactory questions
> 
> 
> Hi Blaine,
> 
> -> 
> -> I'm trying to understand how the SimpleTypeFactory works.  
> I think I
> -> understand it down to loadTypesDefinitions().  That's where I 
> -> get lost. 
> This code will be deprecated and replaced by a new object model.
> As you see, it is too complex...
> 
> ->It looks like a mapping is created between a "string" 
> SimpleType and a
> ->org.exolab.castor.builder.types.XSString type.  Is this correct? 
> 
> No, org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.simpletypes does not rely on 
> org.exolab.castor.builder, it is the other way
> around ;+)
> 
> -> So if I
> -> want to create a SimpleType of type "string", does it create an 
> -> instance of
> -> XSString, or StringType?
> StringType
> 
> -> 
> -> In addition to this, I see that Schema has a 
> createSimpleType method.
> -> createSimpleType has a baseType parameter.  If I don't want a 
> -> derived type,
> -> but a "string", how do I create a SimpleType of type 
> "string", not a
> -> SimpleType derived from type "string"?
> 
> All the base type are loaded in-memory by 
> loadTypeDefinition(), you just have to play with them
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Arnaud
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------- 
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
>       unsubscribe castor-dev
> 

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-dev