In the latest version of the user guide, in section 2.3.2.14, I see that a
complexType InvoiceType is mapped to a class InvoiceType and a group Person
is mapped to a class Person. However, I believe it is quite legal to declare
also a global complexType Person this would seem to result in a name
conflict between the two classes, and one would overwrite the other.
Is this a problem in the implementation or the documentation?
Mette Hedin
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
