So a binding file will be introduced in a later version in other words? While I am not fond of binding files in general, I think it is good that the name collision is reported.
Mette Hedin > -----Original Message----- > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Documentation Question > > > The binding file is not currently in the CVS and will enter in > review phase but we are focused on another problem right now so > you should expect some delays before the next release. > And yes, the user must know that name collision occurs to > configure the binding file but > Castor will be able to give the user the problematic names. > > Thanks, > Arnaud > > -> -----Original Message----- > -> From: Hedin, Mette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > -> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:09 PM > -> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -> Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Documentation Question > -> > -> > -> Is this binding file the same sort of binding file that is > discussed for > -> JAXB? Is this binding file used in the current version of > -> Castor, or is it a > -> feature that is added for the next version? Does this mean that > -> you have to > -> realize that there are name collisions in your schemas and > -> configure for it? > -> > -> Mette Hedin > -> > -> > -> > -----Original Message----- > -> > From: Arnaud Blandin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > -> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:23 PM > -> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -> > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Documentation Question > -> > > -> > > -> > Hi Mette, > -> > > -> > you're right....it is the old known naming collision problem. > -> > This problem will be solved in the next version of Castor > -> > with the source generator binding > -> > file that will give you more control on the generated classes. > -> > > -> > Arnaud > -> > > -> > -> -----Original Message----- > -> > -> From: Hedin, Mette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > -> > -> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:56 PM > -> > -> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -> > -> Subject: [castor-dev] Documentation Question > -> > -> > -> > -> > -> > -> In the latest version of the user guide, in section > 2.3.2.14, I > -> > -> see that a > -> > -> complexType InvoiceType is mapped to a class > InvoiceType and a > -> > -> group Person > -> > -> is mapped to a class Person. However, I believe it is quite > -> > -> legal to declare > -> > -> also a global complexType Person this would seem to result > -> > in a name > -> > -> conflict between the two classes, and one would overwrite > -> > the other. > -> > -> > -> > -> Is this a problem in the implementation or the documentation? > -> > -> > -> > -> Mette Hedin > -> > -> > -> > -> ----------------------------------------------------------- > -> > -> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > -> > -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > -> > -> unsubscribe castor-dev > -> > > -> > ----------------------------------------------------------- > -> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > -> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > -> > unsubscribe castor-dev > -> > > -> > -> ----------------------------------------------------------- > -> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > -> unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
