|
I
guess I'm worried because my Oracle patch never got committed (twice submitted)
I don't know who has commit status, and currently there are a bunch of bugs (ie
set-method, get-method) that made it into a release that should have been caught
by unit tests. Should we patch those? or will they not make it into the main
line? I'm not adverse to hunting down the get-set bugs, but the code is complex,
and while it might take us a long time to hunt down the get-set method bugs, it
could take one of you guys a couple hours. I wish we had "spare time" to work on
this but such is the lifestyle.
You
are right, adding new features at this point isn't a high priority if the
architecture is changing, but fixing bugs should be. IMHO reporting bugs on a
mailing list isn't very effective, and the bugzilla db isn't up to date (as far
as I know). maybe someone other than the developers should consider maintaining
a bug database that the castor dev people can look at, to see what users in the
field are doing; in a lot of cases we (the users) are stressing castor JDO a lot
more than even the developers.
Having
said that, I do appreciate you guys working on this product, especially in
your valuable spare time. Keep up the good work.
cheers,
Matthew
|
Title: Re: [castor-dev] unable to call update
- [castor-dev] RE: [castor-dev] unable to call update Matthew Baird
- [castor-dev] RE: [castor-dev] unable to call update Matthew Baird
