I have a number of patches I have submitted both on this list and
to bugzilla which after many months still have not been committed
to CVS. At least maintenance of these patches for the version of
Castor which I use is easy to do with CVS. But it would still be
nice if the patches could be reviewed and either commited or rejected.
A few of the patches I submitted were committed, but I still have
about three more which have not.
Regards,
Glenn
Matthew Baird wrote:
> Something that really held up development was; Everytime a change was
> requested/proposed, someone would talk about the big refactoring and
> architecture change that was coming (Someone else mentioned this point
> already). I don't think this refactoring/arch change is coming for a LONG
> time, unless Thomas and the exolab declassify the design documents/plans for
> the change and donate them to the community so someone else can make the
> change.
>
> I see this as a survival move for Castor, as there are starting to be other
> more actively developed projects sneaking up on them (OJB Anyone?)
>
> so..... FREE THE INFORMATION! Let us peek at the proposed plans for JDO and
> let us pick it up and continue!
>
> regards,
> Matthew
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder |
MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. |
Missouri Research and Education Network | */ |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
