I looked yesterday at distributed cache at http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/jcs/ and I wonder what should be changed in Castor JDO except adding invalidate and Cache factory in order to use it.
Ilia --- Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > From: "Thomas Yip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:28:16 -0700 > > > > For example, should distributed cache, and local > cache put > > together. Sound like it is, right? But, I don't > think so. In my > > opinion, distributed cache should be implemented > as cache > > purging policy. It should actually not part of > cache > > implementation, and they shouldn't be put > together. > > I want to see about clarification on this issue, > since this is > specifically important to me. I've argued that > caching systems should > be 'plug-in'. Meaning, an API for the cache is > defined, and a factory > object exists that can be referenced in the > castor.properties file of > which cache factory to use to get the cache. The API > needs to allow > for multiple caches from the one factory (LRU count > versus > time-limited) but allows the implementation to vary. > This opens open > implementation to other developers. > > I understand that the main affect we need for a > distribute cache is > simply the ability to remove objects from the cache. > That way, one > can build a distributed system to allow this. > However, for me, that > is only the beginning. Regardless; I would like to > propose a change > to the current caching system... rather than make > the cache system > 'private' and fixed in the current implementation, > allow me to make > modifications that would open the api for a > 'plugable' cache system. > Castor out-of-the-box would see no change; but allow > for developers to > add in their own caching system. > > Comments? (I've been dying to do this for a long > time) > > - -- > > Virtually, > Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 > D08C 2F45 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net > > iD8DBQE8zsEoiysnOdCML0URAkuzAJ9g5QKUEYfZ2a2fwqp115b1P6LeWwCffIsk > YuIc5AYbLiqUJVbWaQ8ldgY= > =MDyL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send > mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
