> From: "Thomas Yip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:09:39 -0700
> It seems to me you should have your own implementation
> of LockEngine. I am pretty sure it is much easier than
> design a pluggable architecture.
Yes. That is exactly what I'm looking for. The Lock Engine should be
'plugable', meaning that the castor.properties file should contain the
name of the imlementing LockEngine.
--
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
