Hi Thomas,
I like to think about the FieldMolder & FieldHandler part. Actually, I have
done some refactoring in this part. I will take care of the separating of XML
and JDO mapping.
If I finish, I will send you the code, OK?
Dirk
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2002 03:03 schrieb Thomas Yip:
> Hi Dirk,
>
>
> You are right, that part of code should be refactor.
> And, I admit that many things should be done better.
>
> The idea was separating the mapping loading
> of JDO and XML. Because two parts evolves,
> and each adds significant amount of specific
> mapping that doesn't make sense for the other.
>
> We have two choices. Either we make
> the mapping loading to load the combined set
> of all mapping.
>
> But, I believed it would be better for each part to
> evolve if we don't share the same loading
> mechanism.
>
> >Now, the ClassMolder and the FieldMolder are used only in the JDO
>
> environment.
>
> >OK, but what is changed in the set/get/field accessor? The FieldMolder is
> >able to use the FieldHandler to access the methods.
>
> It was more than a year ago... I don't clearly remember.
> I think we got a few issue of making changes on that class
> for JDO causes problem to XML or the other way around...
>
> I was trying to separate them completely, so that we won't
> have those issue again. And, yes maybe it is not be the
> best way.
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
