Well, I tried the daily CVS tar file and I'm still getting get_new() and set_new(). I can't figure out if anything's different for my schema between New and Modify. I did notice if I changed to While just to test the keyword theory I do indeed get get_while() even if While starts with capital W.
Any other ideas? Thanks! -Angelina Talley -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] unexpected method names in generated Java code Will do. I'll let you know if it doesn't work. I was kinda surprised New seemed to be acting like a keyword. I wouldn't be surprised that "new" would, but "New" surprised me. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] unexpected method names in generated Java code Angelina, I haven't tried it in 0.9.5.3, but in my development branch (which uses the CVS version) an element with name "New" generates getNew() and setNew() methods just fine. I don't recall any changes to the naming algorithms since 0.9.5.3 so it should work ok, but you may want to try the CVS version instead. --Keith > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello! We are in the process of upgrading from Castor 0.9.3.9 to > Castor 0.9.5.3. As part of that process we have done extensive > reworking of our XML schema. I have noticed that one bit of code is > being generated differently and I was wondering why and if there is a > known workaround. > > What's happening is this. The following schema snippet doesn't produce > the expected Java code: > > <complexType name="APLTaskType"> > <sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> > <element name="Modify" type="apl:ModifyType" minOccurs="0" > maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <element name="New" type="apl:NewType" minOccurs="0" > maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </sequence> > </complexType> > > In APLTaskTypeItem.java, the expected getModify(), enumerateModify(), > etc. are generated just fine. However, for New we get get_new() and > enumerate_new(), etc. instead of the expected getNew(), etc. If the > element name "New" is changed to "Create" or "NEW", it works just > fine. I figure perhaps we are hitting on some reserved keyword or > something like that, but I'm not sure. Is this a known issue, or does > anyone know a good workaround? > > Thanks in advance! > > -Angelina Talley > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-user ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-user ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-user ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-user
