Angelina,
I can't reproduce the problem. I'm using the CVS version as well and it's working ok for me. Since you are using the tar file, I'm assuming your on Unix? I'm running under windows. Anyway, in order to debug, I'm going to need to be able to reproduce it and right now I can't seem to be able to do that. --Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well, I tried the daily CVS tar file and I'm still getting get_new() and > set_new(). I can't figure out if anything's different for my schema between > New and Modify. I did notice if I changed to While just to test the keyword > theory I do indeed get get_while() even if While starts with capital W. > > Any other ideas? > > Thanks! > > -Angelina Talley > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] unexpected method names in generated Java > code > > Will do. I'll let you know if it doesn't work. I was kinda surprised New > seemed to be acting like a keyword. I wouldn't be surprised that "new" > would, but "New" surprised me. > > Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] unexpected method names in generated Java > code > > Angelina, > > I haven't tried it in 0.9.5.3, but in my development branch (which uses the > CVS version) an element with name "New" generates getNew() and > setNew() methods just fine. > > I don't recall any changes to the naming algorithms since 0.9.5.3 so it > should work ok, but you may want to try the CVS version instead. > > --Keith > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hello! We are in the process of upgrading from Castor 0.9.3.9 to > > Castor 0.9.5.3. As part of that process we have done extensive > > reworking of our XML schema. I have noticed that one bit of code is > > being generated differently and I was wondering why and if there is a > > known workaround. > > > > What's happening is this. The following schema snippet doesn't produce > > the expected Java code: > > > > <complexType name="APLTaskType"> > > <sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> > > <element name="Modify" type="apl:ModifyType" minOccurs="0" > > maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > > <element name="New" type="apl:NewType" minOccurs="0" > > maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > > </sequence> > > </complexType> > > > > In APLTaskTypeItem.java, the expected getModify(), enumerateModify(), > > etc. are generated just fine. However, for New we get get_new() and > > enumerate_new(), etc. instead of the expected getNew(), etc. If the > > element name "New" is changed to "Create" or "NEW", it works just > > fine. I figure perhaps we are hitting on some reserved keyword or > > something like that, but I'm not sure. Is this a known issue, or does > > anyone know a good workaround? > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > -Angelina Talley > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-user > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-user > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-user > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-user ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-user
