Laughing... I have Phil Bolger's book, "Boats with an Open Mind".  After
looking over some of the designs, I told my wife what my mother used to say
a lot when I was young--"Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out."

It may have happened despite her warning.

Dave Shaddock

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tim ford
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Kort Nozzle

YES!!!  The Dol-Fin...I remember the teeny ads in the back of mags like 
Small Boat Journal!!!

I can still see little half-tones of the beasts in my mind, burned into 
my brain like
neurological fossils from some graceful, simpler time of Phil Bolger 
designs and
Edey & Duff gunkholers.

Wait...did I just use the word "graceful" in the same sentence with 
"Phil Bolger?"

tf
no fatty knees





David Shugarts wrote:
>
> There is a certain unavoidable dichotomy about this. I cannot see how a
> racing sailor would want it, but a cruising sailor would probably really
> like it (depending on his waters). We grow a lot of marine flora and fauna
> here in Connecticut, and I wouldn't want it, whether racing or cruising.
But
> wherever it could be kept clean, it would make a serious difference in
> thrust, at a cost in drag (especially under sail).
>
> Similarly, there is an even simpler device said to give certain beneficial
> effects to an outboard. Back around 1987, I was editor of Powerboat
Reports
> and we decided to test a device called the Dol-fin. I don't know whether
it
> is still available. Essentially, it is like adding stylish wingtips to
your
> anti-cavitation plate. There were various claims of fuel efficiency, speed
> and control, I believe. As I recall (20 years ago now) there was no
> appreciable difference in any parameter when we tested it in real-life
> conditions. You were trading off some well-understood aerodynamic (er,
> hydrodynamic) benefits versus wetted surface (wetted surface always means
> drag).
>
> --Dave S.
>   

Reply via email to