Richard Jones wrote: > On Friday 03 March 2006 10:14, you wrote: > >>I'd go +1 for (freeform) tags.. the tags people want to use to >>describe their projects should shake out pretty quickly, and it >>prevents us from ever having to request a new topic whenever someone >>comes up with a new idea or web framework :) > > > No, free-form fields should be somewhere else. Propose a "keywords" field if > you like, but I believe the description field performs this job adequately.
There is a keywords field. This would work okay if there was better abilities to query and browse that field. I don't remember how it is stored in the database. But anyway, assuming we are doing that, how should we open up participation? The lack of a representative database dump makes it hard for other people to work on it on their local machines. And of course Subversion access for some people. -- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
