Kevin Dangoor wrote: > On 3/1/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>We want to add Cheese Shop categories for frameworks, so people can >>register things. >> >>These are the ones we (Kevin and I) would like: >> >>Framework :: Paste >>Framework :: TurboGears >>Framework :: TurboGears :: Widgets >>Framework :: TruboGears :: Applications >>Topic :: Internet :: WWW/HTTP :: WSGI >>Topic :: Internet :: WWW/HTTP :: WSGI :: Application >>Topic :: Internet :: WWW/HTTP :: WSGI :: Server >>Topic :: Internet :: WWW/HTTP :: WSGI :: Middleware > > > Still no word on this. I've poked around and found the XML-RPC > interface and how the query mechanism works. Maybe I'll resort to > using keywords or something in the description to be able to find > these.
I actually think this is a good idea anyway. Keywords are freetext and people can come up with their own taxonomies fairly freely. E.g., turbogears+toolbox (all toolbox things), or turbogears+toolbox+sqlobject (all toolbox things that use SQLObject), or toolbox (any framework's toolbox?) It would also be nice if you could do http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/tags/turbogears+toolbox and get a listing, del.icio.us-style, but that can be implemented over XML-RPC for now. The XML-RPC interface could use some additions too... which really brings us back to the question of developer access to the codebase, or more specifically to a representative data set for use in testing? -- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
