On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:24:13 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >>>>> 1. a public statement by somebody that this is the protocol they would >>>>> actually want to use. I still don't see the need for mirroring, so >>>>> I would provide it independent of mirroring. >>>> There are consumers for this sure. >>>> >>>> Linux package maintainers, custom python distributions etc. >>> Which one specifically? >> >> Linux package maintainers could find a use for it because they >> could more quickly get updates from package maintainers. Specifically, >> any distro that repackages from pypi. >> >> Custom Distributions : ActiveState >> >> Also, end users. Even end users could read a package feed from >> pypi and it could enable an update. That would be good for python 3. > > I'm giving up. Who, inside ActiveState, have you talked to who said > that ActiveState wants to use pubsubhubbub for receiving change > notifications from PyPI? I suppose the answer is "Nobody" - you > are just *assuming* that ActiveState may want to use pubsubhubbub.
That wasn't the question the question you asked. Can we get back to talking about mirroring..? Regards David _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
