On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> Minor nitpick: You should remove all implementation specific things >> from that future PEP, of put them in another place. >> >> PEPs are more about standards, API etc.. and using CouchDB is a detail >> and not relevant for its acceptance > > Indeed - if the URLs are specified, I'd probably implement it > "directly", instead of trying to keep a couchdb instance updated.
Yeah - I think a CouchDB server is a good way to build a prototype / proof of concept to begin with, then push it back into PyPI if it's good and useful. > > Regards, > Martin > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
