On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Alexis Métaireau <ale...@notmyidea.org> wrote:
> Le 26/01/2011 20:45, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
>> Indeed - if the URLs are specified, I'd probably implement it
>> "directly", instead of trying to keep a couchdb instance updated.
>
> That's certainly a feature to have. Nevertheless, I do think that
> CouchDB still have a value here, because it's greatly simplifying the
> replication processus, and offers a way to build local websites to
> browse the data in each couchdb instance (i.e. on each node).
Let's try not to conflate the one thing (access to meta-data) with the
other thing (changing the backend database for other reasons). Each on
their own merits :-)
Richard
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
