On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 11:12 -0800, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > Is there a reason this needs to be a trove classifier? Just make some > standard tag and use that :-)
Please define "tag". - C > > --Noah > > On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It'd be useful to have a Trove classifier that signified "the authors > > have no current intention to port this code to Python 3". Such a > > classifier could be used by e.g. http://python3wos.appspot.com/ to > > present a more accurate picture of the current state of porting efforts. > > Currently automated reports like that are bad PR because there's no way > > to communicate the intent. > > > > Perhaps: > > > > Programming Language :: Python :: 2 :: Only > > > > - C > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Catalog-SIG mailing list > > Catalog-SIG@python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
