On 11 December 2011 23:02, Richard Jones <rich...@python.org> wrote: > On 12 December 2011 09:36, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > > If you think that this is still different from what you are asking: > > What specific packages would be tagged with that classifier (I need > > two at least), and did that package authors agree to add the classifier > > to their package if it was available? Which specific classifier do you > > propose to add? > > I believe the unittest2 package is a good example of a package that > would be tagged with "python 2 only" as it represents a backport of > the python 3 unittest module to python 2. > >
Although there is a Python 3 compatible distribution of unittest2, which is currently called unittest2py3k. (It is maintained as a set of patches against CPython head - hence separate distributions for the same package names). Python 2 Only is still applicable to unittest2, until / unless I decide to use a single distribution for both. My only worry is that the classifier would seem to indicate that there *isn't* a Python 3 distribution available, when in fact there is. All the best, Michael > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
