Yuval Greenfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd already contacted several maintainers of packages with such a request.
> Starting this project I assumed PyPI would be a reliable source for this
> information, so I hope you can understand my mindset.

No, unfortunately PyPI isn't so reliable in that respect. Short of
downloading and checking each package manually, the next best option
is to check:

    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/

Here we go:

    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/pylint/   ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/logilab-common/  ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/logilab-astng/  -> green

    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/paste/  ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/pycrypto/  ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/python-dateutil/  -> green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/zconfig/  ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/zdaemon/  ->  green
    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/pyopenssl/  -> green

    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/ordereddict/  ->  green
    [ordereddict is still red on your site]

    http://code.activestate.com/pypm/yolk/  ->  green


That was tough.



Stefan Krah


_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Reply via email to