On 18 December 2011 23:09, Yuval Greenfield <ubershme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Krah > <stefan-use...@bytereef.org>wrote: > >> Yuval Greenfield <ubershme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stefan Krah < >> stefan-use...@bytereef.org> >> > 1) ordereddict is part of: >> > 2) pylint supports Python3 (from their README): >> > >> > 1) Fixed. >> > 2) This is the same issue as with docutils. I believe that either a >> maintainer >> > of PyPI needs to add the trove classifier for them or someone should >> contact >> > Logilab and ask them to add the trove classifier. >> >> The persons who are running PyPI should only edit individual pages in >> exceptional situations (illegal content etc.). >> >> >> I was under the impression that you want to to promote Python3 adoption. >> Why don't you contact Logilab and check the rest of the packages manually? >> >> >> > > I'd already contacted several maintainers of packages with such a request. > Starting this project I assumed PyPI would be a reliable source for this > information, so I hope you can understand my mindset. I guess the WOS is > also good for motivating package owners to fix their classifiers. > > On that note, I think PyPI should require python modules to declare which > version they're compatible with or tested on. > > The use of trove classifiers at all isn't compulsory on PyPI, so although I agree it would be *preferable* for all authors to use them correctly I don't think PyPI is going to require it any time soon. > >> If an author has decided to use the classifier, he already accepts >> that his package might get less attention in the future. This isn't >> an easy decision, so please respect the intent of the classifier and >> remove such packages from your site. >> >> >> > The WOS's main goal is to measure Python3 adoption in some non-trivial > fashion. Total downloads isn't a perfect comparison as many downloads > happened in the 8 years Python2 had a head start. Still, I don't know of a > better metric. Removing packages that are a gigantic part of the python > community would completely defeat the purpose of the site. > > If/when Richard implements the statistics call to PyPI, I might be able to > implement more metrics. > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > some (additional) manual curation for packages that do support Python 3 >> will complete the job. >> >> > Fine, fine, fine.... I added these cute little red triangles to the newly > green docutils and pylint. Are there others I should know of? > Thank you, a great improvement. All the best, Michael Foord > > > Yuval Greenfield > > > ps, some of you might prefer this limited edition better: > http://python3wos.appspot.com/?pygmalion=1 > > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > > -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
