LCCN, January 28, 2014 

ISSN 2324-6464

 

The Olympic Games from a Cataloger's Perspective

By Melanie Polutta, Librarian Cataloger

 

The Olympics. Every two years now, the world sends athletes to one town in
the world, and they compete to decide the best of the best. It's something I
enjoy watching: not just the beautiful grace of the ice skaters or
acrobatics of the gymnasts, but the fierce speed of the downhill skier, the
insane speed of the skeleton racer, the power of the divers, or the
intensity of the high jumper.

 

In my position at the Library of Congress, I'm not paid to watch the
Olympics, but I am paid to catalog them. So how in the world is a name
authority record established for the Olympics?

 

Well, first of all, we have to start with the answer to a question: what is
the actual name of the Olympics? Just in case you didn't know, "Olympics" is
actually the shorthand term for the more official name of the event: the
Olympic Games. (http://www.olympic.org/ancient-olympic-games?tab=history) So
when the name authority record is established
(http://lccn.loc.gov/n94004448), it uses that name as the authorized access
point. Why English? Well, because the official languages of the Olympics are
English and French, and English is the official language of cataloging here
at the Library of Congress. When choosing between the two, we choose
English. However, reflecting the international nature of the games, the name
authority record also contains 78 variations on that name in many different
languages and different scripts, not just English and French. We want to
make sure you can find the authorized form of the name of the Games!

 

Oh, but wait! You may recall that in 1994 the Olympics split into the Summer
and Winter Olympics. Well, the names reflect that. The older of the two
headings, the Olympic Games, is meant for the Olympic Games overall, and for
the Summer Games specifically. The Olympic Winter Games has its own
authority record (http://lccn.loc.gov/n2006026303), with its own complement
of variant names in multiple languages, but not quite as many as the
original record.

 

You may wonder why the basic name of the Games began to refer to the Summer
Games and the Winter Games acquired a more specific name.  I don't know. And
this is one of the important things about cataloging that is important to
remember: we don't have to always know the answers to questions that arise
as we investigate a heading. It can be helpful, and satisfying to our
curiosity, but it is not always necessary to know. We just have to reflect
the usage we find in the resources we catalog. Apparently those resources
consistently referred to the Winter Games as the Olympic Winter Games, and
the Summer Games got the more general heading, Olympic Games. Of course,
that is not perfectly consistent in usage, but we reflect the most commonly
known form of the name as the top choice.  Everything else is a variation.
(Here's a personal guess for why it happened that way. I wonder if it is
because the original Games -- both the ancient ones and the restarted ones
in 1896 -- were strictly a summer phenomenon. The Winter Games didn't start
until 1924. But that is strictly a guess on my part, and if someone else
knows the answer, I would be fascinated to find out.)

 

So, we have a name authority record for the Olympic Games and the Olympic
Winter Games. But that leads to two situations for which these two names
alone are insufficient: what if the access point I need is specific to only
one occurrence of the Games? Or what if I want to talk about the Games in
general? Well, there are solutions to those problems.

 

When I want to be specific, I take the basic authorized name and add extra
details to make it unique. Those details include the number -- this year is
the 22nd Olympiad in winter -- the year -- obviously for this Olympiad it
will be 2014 -- and the place -- Sochi, Russia, that won the honor of
hosting for this year. So the authorized name in library catalogs for this
year's Olympiad is: Olympic Winter Games (22nd : 2014 : Sochi, Russia)
(http://lccn.loc.gov/n2009042303). So now, library users, you will know
precisely what name to use when you go to the library catalog to find out
anything about the Sochi Olympics that your library owns. (Which, at the
moment, is probably nothing. But eventually . I always like the highlights
videos.)

 

Now for the other side of that coin, what if I want to talk about the
Olympic Games as a general concept over the centuries? Well, when that
happens, it is a subject, and we use the subject authority file, which is
different from the name authority file. In that file, the name for the
Olympics as a concept is, well: Olympics (http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85094647).
The subject authority file uses a different set of criteria to establish a
name, so it stuck with the simpler name, both because that is how people
refer to it, and because that distinguishes the heading from the name
authority record. But the subject file did follow the example of the name
file in one way: the general Olympics subject heading is for both the
Olympics in all its variety, as well as for the more specific Summer
Olympics, while the Winter Olympics get its own, more specific, subject
authority record (http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85147037).

 

Do we really need all those access points in the library catalog? How many
resources do we have that actually use all these names? One quick search in
the Library of Congress catalog of all resources with the word Olympics in
the subject area produces 1,763 entries. How about in the name area? Well,
that produces a considerably smaller 154 records, but that is actually quite
a lot! It includes books, periodicals, sound recordings, videos, and maps,
with dates from 1972 to 2012. Do you want to see art or hear music inspired
by the Games? Or perhaps you might be interested in reading the official
report on the Seoul Games - in Korean? Or maybe you would be fascinated by
the bid submission of Salt Lake City, Utah? I think I might be more
interested in an official history of the Olympics
(http://lccn.loc.gov/2008425378). There's always something new to learn!

 

 

  _____  

 

At end of posting:

Disclaimer: This message does not represent official Library of Congress
communications. Links to external Internet sites on Library of Congress Web
pages do not constitute the Library's endorsement of the content of their
Web sites or of their policies or products. Please read our Standard
Disclaimer. (http://www.loc.gov/global/disclaim.html) 

 

LCCN is available in electronic form only and is free of charge. Please
forward it to anyone who might be interested in reading this article and/or
subscribing. To subscribe, send a mail message to [email protected]
with the text: subscribe lccn [firstname lastname]. Please be sure that the
text is the body of the message, not the subject line. And if you wish to
see previous postings from this listserv, go to
http://sun8.loc.gov/listarch/lccn.html

 

 

Reply via email to