The National Library of Medicine (NLM) wants to remind libraries that
beginning with the December 2015 distribution of new records in CATFILE and
SERFILE, NLM subject terms (MeSH) will be distributed with topical subjects
recorded in 650 $a or 650 $a $x; geographic subjects recorded in 651 $a or
651 $a $x; and publication type/genre terms record in 655 $a.  In January
2016, the entire CATFILE and SERFILE databases will be released with these
updates made to all the records. NLM recommends that libraries that want
their data to be consistent with the NLM files download the full update.

 

Catalogers in other libraries that use MeSH are encouraged to follow NLM
practice in assigning their subjects.  Under no circumstances should a
library edit a record in OCLC to re-create a string and remove the 651 and
655 fields. Any desired editing should be done only in your local catalog.
After January 2016, libraries will be required to establish medical subjects
in a deconstructed format in OCLC.  OCLC will be updating all records with
650 fields with a second indicator of 2 to follow the new NLM practice in
January.  NLM is working with authority vendors to provide guidance on how
local catalogs can be updated.

 

The Program for Cooperative Cataloging will soon be issuing guidelines for
BIBCO and CONSER libraries that use MeSH.  The new guidelines will take
effect January 1, 2016.

 

Example:

Old form (with string)

650 12   $a Health Policy $z Africa $v Congresses

650 12     $a Health Policy $z Caribbean Region $v Congresses          

650 22   $a Cross Cultural Comparison $z Africa $v Congresses

650 22   $a Cross Cultural Comparison $z Caribbean Region $v Congresses

 

New form (deconstructed)

650 12   $a Health Policy

650 22   $a Cross Cultural Comparison

651  2    $a Africa

651  2    $a Caribbean Region

655  2    $a Congresses 

 

 

 

Diane Boehr

Head, Cataloging and Metadata Management Section

National Library of Medicine

8600 Rockville Pike

MSC 3823

Bethesda, MD 20894

301-435-7059

[email protected]

 

 

 

Reply via email to