Matt S Trout ha scritto: > Marcello Romani wrote: >> Matt S Trout ha scritto: >>> Marcello Romani wrote: >>>> Matt S Trout ha scritto: >>>>> I like checking ($c->action->reverse eq 'users/login') myself. >>>> Matt, what do you think of ($c->req->path eq 'auth/login') ? >>> Fine until the marketing department decides that actually, the URL should >>> be >>> "authen/login". If you always use the private action names to do the work >>> that's easy to do. If you rely on public URIs in your code, not so easy ... >>> >> Thanks. >> >> Therefore the 'reverse' method gives the private "path" of the action ? > > Yep. You could also match $c->action->class and ->name if you so desired. >
Thanks! I think this should go somewhere into the docs or in a tutorial on authorization. I'm browsing the dev site right now to find a suitable place... -- Marcello Romani Responsabile IT Ottotecnica s.r.l. http://www.ottotecnica.com _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
