Marcello Romani ha scritto: > Matt S Trout ha scritto: >> Marcello Romani wrote: >>> Matt S Trout ha scritto: >>>> Marcello Romani wrote: >>>>> Matt S Trout ha scritto: >>>>>> I like checking ($c->action->reverse eq 'users/login') myself. >>>>> Matt, what do you think of ($c->req->path eq 'auth/login') ? >>>> Fine until the marketing department decides that actually, the URL should >>>> be >>>> "authen/login". If you always use the private action names to do the work >>>> that's easy to do. If you rely on public URIs in your code, not so easy ... >>>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Therefore the 'reverse' method gives the private "path" of the action ? >> Yep. You could also match $c->action->class and ->name if you so desired. >> > > Thanks! > > I think this should go somewhere into the docs or in a tutorial on > authorization. I'm browsing the dev site right now to find a suitable > place... >
I wrote a paragraph about this in the BestPractices wiki page. -- Marcello Romani Responsabile IT Ottotecnica s.r.l. http://www.ottotecnica.com _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
