Please be consistent with the number of digits in the versioning scheme. While it may be easy for humans to guess that 5.7001 comes before 5.80, packaging tools like RPM and APT could easily get confused. While such problems could be worked around by using tricks like epoch numbers, it would be best to avoid the headache altogether with a sane versioning scheme.
Derek On 26 Jun 2006, at 05:25 , Matt S Trout wrote: > Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:18:54AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: >>> Marcus Ramberg wrote: >>>> I've just pushed Catalyst 5.70_01 to CPAN. You can check it out >>>> here: >>> Is final version will be numbered as 5.70? >> >> 5.7000 or 5.70000 hopefully :-) >> >> Your friendly FreeBSD ports guy, > > Already born in mind. We figured it wouldn't make much difference > leaving off > the extra zeros for a dev release though. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
