Derek Poon wrote:
> Please be consistent with the number of digits in the versioning
> scheme. While it may be easy for humans to guess that 5.7001 comes
> before 5.80, packaging tools like RPM and APT could easily get
> confused. While such problems could be worked around by using tricks
> like epoch numbers, it would be best to avoid the headache altogether
> with a sane versioning scheme.
Already born in mind. We figured it wouldn't make much difference leaving off
the extra zeros for a dev release though.
--
Matt S Trout Offering custom development, consultancy and support
Technical Director contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
