On 7/1/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but that was only because your code was using an undocumented untested > hack that I originally offered to you as such :)
Since it was the only way to accomplish it, I find it to be a rather important hack. ;-) It (or something else that allows the same type of functionality) really should become a supported feature because it's really needed when you're pushing on the "reusable resultsets" paradigm that DBIC seems to favor. But I really wasn't trying to imply that DBIC is broken or anything like that, I'm sorry if you understood it that way. It's just that I already face enough obstacles when "trying to revolutionize everything" (i.e. stubborn managers) that breakage between versions is the last thing I would need right now. That's why I've been bugging you with Win32 test failures and whatever else I could find. -Nilson Santos F. Jr. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
