Paul Makepeace wrote: > On 11/16/06, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Regardless of whether the test is 'real world', and regardless of >> whether the frameworks 'were meant to serve more complicated things', >> Catalyst is slower in this instance. All things being unequal, if I tell >> my boss we have 3 frameworks to choose from, and one is flexible, and >> the others are fast, he's going to choose fast every time...even knowing >> the testing may be faulty. Yes, I know better. He probably does too. But >> that's how the world works. > > What world is this? The world that doesn't realise programmers are far > more expensive than hardware? The world where bosses don't realise the > cost of inflexibility? The ability not to adapt fast is a concern > that's been hammered long and hard in business circles since forever > so this nominal boss would have to be really particularly shortsighted > to blindly choose speed over flexibility. > > Post a rebuttal, suggest better benchmarks, leave a trackback, move > on. This doesn't seem like getting wound up about. > > Paul
It's a world where PHBs often look at web stats and ask "What the hell is this slow" a lot more than they ask "Why isn't the system flexible". -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
