The main devs confirmed my results. Concerning your benchmark, I am
pretty sure you screwed up some where, ie: running web brick in
development mode.
Regardless, the benchmark was fairly simplistic to begin with which
only stressed the dispatcher.
-Victor
On Jan 15, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
I remember the discussion here - but it seems that nobody tried to
independently verify the results. I did compare Rails and Catalyst
and on my pretty standard Debian box Catalyst was about 50% faster
than Rails.
--
Zbyszek
On 1/14/07, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is ablog I just found. Is it true that Catalyst is so slow
comparing
with other frameworks?
http://letsgetdugg.com/category/rails
Octavian
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/
[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/
[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
