you honestly can't come to much of a conclusion about a test that just hits the docroot over and over again, and sees how many connections per second happen as a result. The test may say that one aprticular aspect of RoR is quicker ... but it's not an aspect that has a huge impact, given that the speed of most apps is affected by what happens in the db layer.
After all, if you wanted you app to do this, you would just apache serving a static file :-)\ Also, I noted that perrin's comment about using the -r option for dprof hasn't been answered - maybe there was something else altogether going on. On 1/15/07, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Carl Johnstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Is it true that Catalyst is so slow comparing >> with other frameworks? > > Does it matter? Of course it does. > If speed is so important, you should write your own custom httpd that does > exactly what you need in assembly language. It is too hard to write it in assembly, but it could be more easy to use Ruby on Rails instead if RoR is really faster. That's why I have asked. Now to say the truth, I won't use RoR because I don't know Ruby, but I want to know which are the advantages and disadvantages of Catalyst comparing with other frameworks. Octavian _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
-- Daniel McBrearty email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer BTW : 0873928131 _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
