On 18/04/07, Chisel Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:21:07AM -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > I think it's pretty clear that Subversion is a failure for our project. We It's not clear to me - where's the memo? I don't recall reading anything about the failing of svn/svk on this list - can you either elaborate or point me at a thread I missed?
I've had a couple of problems with nuking other people's work with my lack of svk skills, but I find the distributed backup too good a feature to go back to svn. My understanding is that git supports this feature as well. I think jrockway's original complaint was that the svn/svk model makes merging quite difficult and slows down progress which means that new features are only released slowly. For example there's a rather useful refactor of Catalyst::Test somewhere in the bowels of branches/ that's at risk of getting lost. Me, I don't care, so long as the instructions of how to use it are reasonably detailed and that the first couple of times I do anything interesting™ someone promises to hold my hand :)
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
