Kiki wrote: > Jonathan Rockway wrote: >> I think it's pretty clear that Subversion is a failure for our project. We >> use topic branches heavily, and that's just not something svn (or really >> svk) >> is designed for. >> >> I hearby propose that we switch to git. I envision each project in trunk to >> be a separate repository. That will allow us to easily manage commit >> permissions, and keep branches sane (branching Catalyst-Runtime need not >> affect Catalyst-Plugin-Foobar). I'm willing to setup and administer All >> Things Git if we decide to switch. >> > All nice and peachy, except for lack of a native win32 port... to use > git on win32 you apparently have the following alternatives: > > 1. recompile it with mingw
While I agree this isn't ideal, it's also not that bad. SVK ships with it's own complete perl anyways for the binary installer, so in theory, a Git client could do the same, maybe with even Strawberry Perl, which is ming based anyways. But I digress. SVN/SVK is broken? Hell, I just moved from SVN to SVK and now I have to move again? Not. Hell, if the crazyness that is DBIC branches/trunk/release path can survive SVK with all the hands in its basket, so can Catalyst. -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
