On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:43:33AM +1030, Jon Schutz wrote: > Personally I would not consider Ubuntu suitable as a production server > platform as it is too close to the bleading edge.
Because 6.06 is the long-term supported release it's been rather more conservative. As I've already said, I don't consider the non-LTS releases suitable either, but we deployed 6.06 when Debian stable was still 3.0 and -way- too behind the times for our tastes. I suspect our next revision of our platform will be to Debian 4 if nothing better comes along in the mean time. -- Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project? Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/ Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform? http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/ _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/