Peter Edwards wrote:
Centos 5 == Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. For production quality, you can expect it to be pretty stable and I have corporate customers running it successfully. It's one of our development platforms. However, note mst's comments about the broken Perl on it. I found that quite shocking considering it's supposed to be a premier Linux hosting platform. As usual, compiling your own perl and Apache and providing your own PERL5LIB dir per live application area is a sane way of going about delivering standardised live applications you can roll out and support.
Possibly a bit OT now, but as I'm about to set up another production server and was going to use CentOS 5, I'm a bit concerned. Matt mentioned fstab and init, but not as far as I can see Perl - in what way is Perl broken on CentOS 5?
-- Richard Jones _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
