On 12/30/2007 02:54 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > [F'up-to dbix-class] > > * Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-24 19:30]: >> You might want to see about ripping out the C::M::DBI >> connection management and using a DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI >> object instead - the Model::DBI code originates from a copy of >> the DBIx::Class code but I'm unaware of whether bugfixes and >> refactorings have been propagated to it. > > Might it be worthwhile to rip the code out of both and put it in > a separate DBIx::EnsureConnected or something like that, and then > make sure that such objects can be used in place of plain DBI > handles, so that anyone who needs this functionality can use that > instead of maintaining the $N'th copy of the code? >
How is this different than DBI's own connect_cached() method? http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI-1.601/DBI.pm#connect_cached -- Peter Karman . [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://peknet.com/ _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
