On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:31:37PM -0700, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But you're writing a new catalyst app, so you're deploying it under
> > fastcgi,
> > right?
> >
> > Really, mod_perl is a legacy deployment option. Don't.
> ...
> > http://chainsawblues.vox.com/
>
> Your blog is powered by Catalyst running under mod_perl 1.x. Seriously...
Thus proving that people who've spent many years wrangling mod_perl 1 can
make it run very impressively.
I've spent a couple years with MP1 and while I doubt I'm as good as you
guys are with it I can make it behave quite well enough for any purpose I've
ever needed to.
And yet I still deploy everything on FastCGI now, because it's an order
of magnitude less fucking about. Draw your own conclusions.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
