* Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 19:10]: > * On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: >> * Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 11:25]: >>> * On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Jon Schutz wrote: >>> > No problems, if that's what the Catalyst standard says; I >>> > must have missed it. Where is it? I'd like to consult it on >>> > a number of matters... please post the link. >>> >>> Basically it's more of a "zeitgeist" than an actual document. >>> There are some things that the community has decided and >>> "just do". >> >> That’s the sort of feel-good bollocks I’d expect to read on a >> Rails hype blog, not here. Unspoken rules and gut feel are no >> way to run a community. Catalyst suffers from this in general: >> way too little is written down, much less in any systematic >> fashion. > > Nobody has time to run a bureaucracy. We just want to write > code.
Yes, backcompat code. And I suppose the time to run a deprecation cycle bureaucracy will find itself. File under “false laziness.” Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
